Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 05:54

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Wall Street warns Trump aides the GOP tax bill could jolt bond markets - The Washington Post
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Democrats be honest, how many of you were wishing that Musk rescue space flight blew up?
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Newspaper headlines: 'A generation let down' and 'Israel claims control' - BBC
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Is Beauty of Joseon Sunscreen good for oily skin?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Shortcuts is getting an AI-powered revamp; here’s what that could mean - 9to5Mac
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
How can someone in your family purposely try to destroy your reputation?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Scientists discover 230 new giant viruses that shape ocean life and health - Phys.org
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
ISS Research & Development Conference Cancellation - NASA Watch
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ryan Reynolds’ ‘Animal Friends’ Delayed to 2026 at Warner Bros. - The Hollywood Reporter